AI in the Workplace: 5 Realities Every Job Seeker Needs to Understand About AI

By: Beth Schaefer, IPD Director

My introductory AI article, AI, Am I Right?  suggested that I do not intentionally use Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the workplace, but in reality, I use AI all the time for my work.  AI will eventually level out and become more efficient, but it’s not going to leave the workplace; therefore, let’s discuss how to get the most from your AI interactions with the series AI in the Workplace.

And, let’s start at the beginning: using AI to secure a job. Whether you love AI or distrust it, the truth is simple: job seekers who understand how AI screens, sorts, and evaluates candidates will outperform those who don’t.  Here are 5 realities that job seekers need to navigate.

  1. Your AI prompts determine your results.

To work with AI, you’re going to need to use AI, so learning best practices for AI will be a good investment of your time.  Any use of AI is all about the prompt. I highly recommend this free course on AI prompting.  Even if you do the first 3 modules, it will make your use of AI more accurate and efficient. This “old” adage still applies: Bad data in; bad data out.

2. Your resume must pass an algorithm before it reaches a human.

While not every job you apply for may use an Applicant Tracking System (ATS), an estimated 90% of companies are using them including 99% of Fortune 500 companies.  These systems use algorithms to screen and score resumes much faster than human review.

This raises the importance of including the correct keywords in your resume. For example, if the job description says project coordination, and your resume says project support, the ATS may not match them — even though a human would.  ATS systems match patterns, not concepts. Even so, do not use the “kitchen sink approach” for resume keywords, since ATS’s have a 67% rejection rate of resumes that have 20+ skills listed.  Instead tailor each resume to each posting you apply to.

Click Here For a Printable PDF of Job Seeking Advice

3. ATS parsing errors eliminate qualified candidates every day.
An ATS parses out a resume by extracting pieces of information by category. Parsing out, to me, is an old-fashioned phrase that my grandma would use (“I will parse out the strawberries so each of you gets the same amount.”) For resumes, the parsing categories are:
• Name
• Contact info
• Job titles
• Dates of employment
• Skills
• Education
• Certifications
If this information is presented in an unsupported format, such as a text box, it will be difficult for the ATS to find the information, and your resume may not pass ATS screening. The ATS rate of rejecting resumes due to formatting is 12% and for parsing issues (not being able to find the most necessary information for whatever reason), the rejection rate is 23%. To see if your resume is readable to AI, use a free resume checker. Some of those options are in the resource list at the end of the article.

4. AI can reduce bias — or amplify it.
One of the reasons employers want to use AI for screening is that it can reduce the bias that humans bring (often subconsciously) to the applicant screening process. This is good news for those who are most often eliminated due to bias; however, bias doesn’t disappear just because a machine is involved — it simply becomes harder to detect.

The bad data in, bad data out rule applies here as well.

The rules an ATS uses to screen candidates are set by humans. Unless those rules are set by a skilled person who is deliberately trying to remove bias, the algorithm might end up with the same biases as the humans involved. Currently, there are no existing laws or regulations for using ATS that ensure the process is equitable or even meets existing HR guidelines stated on an organization’s website.

As a job applicant, you cannot influence unconscious bias from an ATS any more than you can from human review. But the next time you apply for a job that you seem perfect for, and you do not move forward in the process, know that the candidate selection process, with or without ATS, is still far from perfect.

5. AI can help you prepare for interviews more effectively than ever.
Some organizations are using AI to conduct first-round interviews; therefore, they use AI to talk to AI. Use your newly acquired prompting skills to predict interview questions and prepare responses. If you can prompt better than your other candidates (and this includes using AI for company research), you will be better prepared. Do refrain from just having AI write your responses, or you will just sound like AI- and maybe like all the other candidates. Remember, the interview technique: STAR. State the situation or challenge; explain your task or role in the situation; describe the action you took and emphasize the result you achieved. This will help keep your interview answers focused on you rather than AI’s generic responses.

If you’re entering the job market, AI isn’t optional — it’s part of the process. Use it intentionally, understand how employers use it, and you’ll have a better chance of standing out in a crowded field.

Whether you’re actively sending out resumes or haven’t job-hunted in years, this is a lot of information to unpack. And, this is just the tip of the iceberg of job-searching in the AI world.  Your best bet for uncovering what is below the surface might just be AI itself.

Visit the sources used to write the article below to learn more.

Options From the IPD

  • All
  • Change Webinar - Past Expert Insights
  • Expert Insights - archives
  • Leadership and
  • leadership and strategy EI
  • Other EI
  • past webinar
  • Public Sector EI
  • webinar

Strategies for Remote & Hybrid Team Management | May 2026 Free Expert Insights Webinar

Explore both the leadership and management aspects of change

Change Management Vs Change Leadership: What’s the Difference? | April 2026 Expert Insights Webinar

Explore both the leadership and management aspects of change

Read More

A.I. – Am I Right?

By: Beth Schaefer, IPD Director

A few years ago, I wrote an article about the value of the curmudgeon in the workplace.  One of the values is that the curmudgeon is willing to say what others are reluctant to say, but are thinking.  Today, I put on my curmudgeon hat to say that I have so many questions on how AI will shape the workplace that I should just write a stand-up routine about it rather than an article.

AI – Am I right?

“AI, a Fitbit, and Crypto Currency walk into a bar…”

“Knock, Knock.

Who’s There?

“AI”

“AI Who?”

“AI hope you’re ready because I have already written your project management plan, turned your spreadsheet into a pivot table, and helped you write this joke.”

I admit it.  I have been avoiding writing about the topic of AI in the workplace.  Topic?  That is the wrong word…  infiltration.

And that is my first problem with AI: it is becoming so ingrained in the workplace that it is hard to pretend it is not there, looking over my shoulder, waiting to kibitz. If I do not embrace AI, will the workplace future pass me by?  But if I leverage AI, then each time I use it, am I actually feeding it the information it needs to replace me and make my role obsolete?  I hear about how corporate is using special AI platforms that protect their intellectual property and innovations.

  • My trivia partner can wax poetically about how he uses AI to write code, test code, and collaborate on code to more quickly and accurately improve software for his transportation firm. And, how glad he is that he will retire before his job is replaced by AI.
  • I have heard that statistics as high as 87% of organizations are using AI to do their hiring, including interviews. Job-seekers wisely started using AI to submit materials and provide answers to interview questions.  And, now that AI is talking to AI and all the candidates are indistinguishable, they are moving back to using people to do hiring again.
  • One of my instructors told me about an organization that uses AI to examine data on how train tracks wear out and how frequently to repair the tracks based on the size of the damage and the weather, and then built a machine that can cruise down the tracks, making some repairs, but ignoring others that can go longer without impacting performance. OK – that sounds pretty cool.

I am not seeing those types of sophisticated uses in my organization, but that does not mean it is not happening, because AI can be sneaky.

And that brings me to the second problem with AI; I do not understand how it works.  My workplace provides access to Copilot.  I also have a personal Copilot subscription that I use at home.  I have heard that different AI platforms are better at different skill sets (much like people), but I still have many questions:

  • Where does the information come from?
  • Am I stealing someone else’s work?
  • Is it ethical?
  • Do I have to announce every time AI gives me the assist?
  • If we quit providing original content to the internet, will we enter a collective closed information loop that is stuck in 2026?
  • How much of the water supply am I using up each time I use AI at work?

On the other hand, I do not really understand how I can both see and talk to my friends living in other states without the use of lines or cables, and I use that technology.  I still remember when Jane Jetson put on her public face to talk on her video phone that was plugged into the wall, and we thought that was far-fetched.  I have clearly embraced wi-fi as I am currently working remotely from home in my blouse and sweatpants – thinking about how antiquated the Jetsons have become.

And, not quite knowing how AI gets information, brings me to my third problem; it is not always right – sometimes it uses falsehoods.  I try to be aware, use common sense, and check what it tells me.  I ask it to provide its sources so that I can check their credibility and AI’s accuracy in interpreting the information, but… I am not sure that everyone is doing that.

And because AI prevaricates without even being aware that it does, my fourth problem is that I have AI trust issues.  Does AI have my best interests as its goal?  Apparently, AI has been in my life for years, but through a third party in the background – not directly tapped by me with questions or commands. It has already been affecting what I see when I search the internet based on my previous searches. It gives me suggestions of what to buy on Amazon based on what I purchased before.  Yet, I can watch Anne of Green Gables on Netflix, and it says, based on Anne of Green Gables, you should watch The Imperfects. Should I, or is AI trying to offload low-performing shows?  Who is AI actually working for? Is it me?

And, because AI uses alogorithms – it’s filled with bias.  It can be easy to view AI as neutral, but it’s not.  AI uses what it believes it already knows about us to provide information that it thinks we want to hear. Do we need another Yes person in the workplace? The AI on my home laptop focuses only on recipes that can go into the freezer because twice I have asked it for freezer-friendly recipes.  AI – you do not know me like that!

To sum it up… AI is –

  • after my job
  • difficult to understand
  • sometimes lying to me
  • giving me bad advice
  • just telling me what it thinks I want to hear

Maybe instead of AI training, I need to take a course on Dealing with the Difficult Coworker. 

Options From the IPD

  • All
  • Change Webinar - Past Expert Insights
  • Expert Insights - archives
  • Leadership and
  • leadership and strategy EI
  • Other EI
  • past webinar
  • Public Sector EI
  • webinar

Strategies for Remote & Hybrid Team Management | May 2026 Free Expert Insights Webinar

Explore both the leadership and management aspects of change

Change Management Vs Change Leadership: What’s the Difference? | April 2026 Expert Insights Webinar

Explore both the leadership and management aspects of change

Read More

Middle Manager Dilemma #1 – Delegation | Middle Management Blog

Delegation: Take It Up A Level

By Beth Schaefer

Delegation is tough.  To delegate is to entrust another to represent you by assigning them responsibility and authority.  And, raise your hand if you have ever been taught how to delegate your work. Anyone?

A few reasons that delegation is difficult for me include:

  1. Ultimately, I am responsible for what happens in my department/on my team.
  2. I know exactly how I want things done and/or how they should be done because I have done almost all the tasks for my department at one time or another for the past 10 years.
  3. I am an achiever: one of my strengths identified from the Gallup Assessment (have your managers take our course Leading with your Strengths to learn theirs). I know that all strengths can become a weakness if taken to an extreme, and the weakness of the achiever strength is that you can have perfectionist tendencies (see item #2).

Those 3 characteristics are what earned me my leadership role.  Why would I abandon what has helped me to succeed? Therefore, as a Middle Manager, I struggle with how much to delegate and if/when to pull work back if results become an issue.

Realistically, as a Middle Manager, you cannot do all the work; hence, the reason you have a team.  You need to delegate work and balance letting go with keeping an eye on the situation.  Ultimately, you are responsible for the work that your team produces.  And this is tricky; in fact, entire training courses do exist on delegating: IPD has one for your leaders called Adopt a Coaching Attitude.

Recently, I heard a conversation that provided some insight that is helping me shape my day-to-day view on delegation.  And, the insight comes from the sports world. I know, I seldom use sports analogies but stick with me on this because this example will use minimal sports jargon to transfer my observation from sports to the workplace.

My sporty source is Mike Conely, a Minnesota Wolves Timberwolves point guard.  Mike, at age 37, is considered the wise old sage of the team.  On a recent KFAN interview*, he was discussing younger players who lose their composure on the court and are flagged for penalties that can hurt the team.  He said that those younger players need to learn how to “play up a level.”

Play up a level means to look at the bigger picture, the bigger goal, the long-term or even short-term goal, but not at any one single moment.  In a moment on any given day, your people may not be at their best; they may make a mistake; they may make an inefficient choice; they may forget a detail, but it’s a moment – it’s not the whole game; it’s not the whole series; and it’s not the whole season.

This “Play up a Level” view helps me to suppress my micromanaging tendencies and be better at delegating and using “mistake moments” to coach rather than pull work back onto my own plate.  Because we are at work, and not at play, I will change the phrase to “Take it up a level.”  This lens will remind me to coach through the moment with a view to the bigger picture rather than trying to keep doing everything myself.

Since I have been honest about my struggle with delegating, you have already guessed that I am not a delegation expert.  I offered one observation for managing delegation, but I would love to hear from you.  Please fill out the form and share your best tip for delegating work.  IPD will select some delegation strategies to publish in next month’s newsletter.

Also, fill out our standard customized training form to indicate your interest in bringing any of IPD’s workshops to the leaders in your organization.

Please note: At the time of writing this article, the Wolves are playing the LA Lakers in the 2025 play-offs, and I am staying up late to watch games on West Coast time.  This may not have a positive effect on my writing, but it is making me a lot more willing to delegate work!

*Apologies to Mike Conley from the Wolves and Dan Barreiro from KFAN as I was unable to locate the conversation analysis in the podcast bank for a proper citation.

Please fill out this form and share your best tip for delegating work:

Read More

Support Middle Management | Middle Management Blog

6 Key Activities That Support Middle Management

By Beth Schaefer

My research from Forbes suggests, “Middle Managers have the potential to drive growth specifically because of their unique position with a company… middle management binds purpose with execution.”

In the second article in the Middle Management Series, I discussed the research supporting the importance of middle managers to an organization. Because of this role’s importance, organizations should intentionally and directly support the people in those roles rather than view them as a “layover” position.

Here are 6 Key Activities organizations can take to build up middle managers and build up their organization’s potential:

  1. Listen to them

And, even better, empower them.  Daily, middle managers observe who and what is working… and who and what is not working.  Ask them to weigh in on decisions and listen to what they say.  Provide them with some latitude to make decisions or execute the organizational goals in a manner that makes sense for their team.  Provide them with training beyond the check-off-the-box meant to save the organization insurance and legal costs and instead pay for professional development that helps them lead their team.

2. Give them credit and respect

Recognize that there isn’t anything wrong with someone who loves their job and does not want to move into C-Suite.  The best leaders are sometimes followers; the best followers are sometimes leaders.  This appears to be a relatively easy concept on the surface, but one that is difficult to juggle within the power dynamic or political climate of an organization.  Middle Managers do this every day.  The best middle managers have the confidence to listen to their team members and to challenge their superiors. Knowing how and when to do both is a nuanced skill that should be respected.

3. Quit measuring success by the number of direct reports

In America, we tend to be about big and bigger: “Value price meals” with extra-large servings; Gawdy stats of individual athletic achievements over the team success; giant SUV’s to transport 1 or 2 people.  It is hard to escape that in America, more equals better, and that quality is often an afterthought. The bigger is better concept is often applied to how middle managers are rewarded.  Someone who has 55 direct reports is paid more than someone who has 34 direct reports who is paid more than someone who has 12 direct reports.  Of course, the natural reaction is, but the 55-report person is doing more work.  The question to ask is, what kind of work?  “Paperwork” and reporting could take most of the time for someone who has 55 direct reports with very little time spent on the actual managing – coaching, communicating, and collaborating. And, most would agree, it’s the “people work” that requires the greater skill.  Put in success measurements that are more than the number of boxes on an organizational chart.

4. Pay for expertise and experience – not organizational chart status

In article 1, I talked about how much I enjoy middle management.  With several years left to work, I have reached my financial peak as a middle manager.  So, unless I choose to move up the organizational chart, my salary will stay the same even as my experience and contributions to the organization grows.  The next layer of leadership shifts into strategy.  While I enjoy using value streams, capability mapping, and the SIPOC to solve problems, I do not want to do hypothetical risk cases and projections all the time.  Reward middle managers for the work they love to do and for their experience of doing it well.

5. Find ways to reward outstanding employees instead of promoting them to management

Most organizations provide one path of financial reward, and it goes through official leadership roles.  This causes people who are experts in research, or selling, or creativity, or coordinating, or engineering, or accounting, or (fill-in-the-black) to leave behind the work they love to do and become a middle manager.  Contrary to this career pathway, being an experienced expert in a specific skill does not necessarily make you good at leadership. Being a good leader is about collaboration, coaching, and communication and often has very little to do with the actual skill and expertise that is valued in the current role.   Every day, somewhere in America, an organization is promoting people into leadership roles as a “reward” when, in fact, they are setting up many of those people for failure, and, indirectly, their teams and organizations for failure too.  Do not use Middle Management as a reward for those who do not really want to be leaders.

6. Pay for Professional Development

I know; I work for an organization that sells professional development.  The reason I do this work is because l believe in its value, but you do not need to go by me – plenty of research will tell you the same thing.  Providing professional development for leaders is critical because leadership challenges are not static.   While some challenges, such as team collaboration, remain perennially relevant, new leadership issues do surface.  For instance, most workplaces now have 4 generations of workers.  Or the latest leadership challenge of when and how to incorporate Artificial Intelligence (AI) and train your team to use it effectively and ethically. Learning about leadership is not just “one and done.”

Ideally, organizations will look at how they structure and support middle management roles so that they can contribute to growing the organization.  However, judging from the number of people I have heard from since starting this series (Middle Managers Part 1), it appears that middle managers find themselves in situations with difficult choices.  The next set of articles will explore common middle managers’ dilemmas and some action suggestions that middle managers can take to navigate them.

Read More

Middle Managers Are Like Oreos | Middle Management Blog

Importance of Middle Managers

Middle Managers are the crème in the Oreos® of the workplace.  They are the delightful, yet functional, filling that connects the two cookie wafers: workers and leadership.

Think about that classic cookie without the filling. That is what an organization is without Middle Management –  two cookies that are disconnected.  You can press them together, but… they will not stick, and might even crumble.

Here are the Top 6 benefits your organization receives through middle managers:

1. Middle Managers Drive Growth.

Middle managers provide purpose to their team.  Feeling connected to the purpose of the organization is one of the best ways to engage a productive workforce. Middle Managers pace work for consistent production that builds resiliency against stress and prevents burnout. A respected Middle Manger can request extra from their team when needed and get it. Middle Managers can foster worker relationships and create high-performing teams, or teach employees how to slack off and not get caught, or be a jerk and create a disenfranchised workforce that results in mediocre products and customer service. That is why it is important to support Middle Managers (strategies to do this in the next article).

2. Middle Managers Set the Tone of the Work Environment.

Some organizational culture trickles down from the top, but it can be reinforced or undermined by a savvy Middle Manager. They set the expectations. The best Middle Managers model respect, kindness, and grace.  They coach their teams to do the same. They find the right time and place to address bad behaviors that can infect the team, nipping them in the bud. Ultimately, their treatment of employees makes the organization either a desirable place to work or one that workers want to leave.

3.Middle Managers Provide Reality Checks.

Timelines, projects, and processes often look good on paper, but they do not tell the tale of the unintended consequence: the fallout when someone who makes a decision is unaware of all the stakeholders or processes affected.  An unintended consequence could result in a process hiccup or an epic fail.  An effective Middle Manager can diplomatically push back on the organization when administrative decisions come with unintended consequences, keeping their organizations on track and running smoothly.

4.Middle Managers are the Organization’s Moral Compass.

While organizations often hire consultants to facilitate leadership’s writing of mission, vision, and values statements, it is the Middle Managers who live it and model it for all employees.  The true culture of the organization is not in the written words, but in the everyday living. Employees watch middle management for how closely their behaviors align with the espoused values.  They listen to Middle Managers explain how the administration’s decisions are connected to (or disconnected from) their mission statement.  Middle Manager’s actions can reveal their feelings about the organization.  Are they trusted leaders or a bunch of phonies who say one thing but do another?  Middle Managers guide the moral and ethical decisions of their entire team.

5.Middle Managers Put the Human in Human Resources

Administration writes policies about human resources or human capital.  These policies provide necessary governance of humans in the workplace, but it is the Middle Managers who put the humanity into the workplace.  Effective Middle Managers take time to listen to individual workers and address their challenges. They are the ones aware of workers who are sick or grieving or struggling for any number of reasons. They know which resources to offer and provide assistance at the moment it is needed.

6.Middle Managers Build Succession and Loyalty.

Middle Managers coach, mentor, and nurture the next generation of leaders.  Through the delegation of work, they can provide low-risk opportunities for their workers to practice leadership.  They can model decision-making, using clear communication, and accepting responsibility for their actions. They can give credit to their teams instead of making themselves look good.  They can build trust with the workforce by being authentic with problems and not being trite or flippant when work is challenging.

The daily decisions and interactions of Middle Managers are the brushstrokes and colors that compose an organization’s painting.

Provide Leading Teams Through Change to your organization to support your Middle Managers.

Read More

Stuck in the Middle? | Middle Management Blog

Stuck In the Middle

Hello, My name is Beth Schaefer, and I am in middle management.

This may not seem like a terrible admission, but… for those of us who find our passion in middle management, we can also find ourselves on the receiving end of sideways glances and whispers…

  • What is wrong with her? She has been in that same role for 10 years!
  • Why haven’t they been promoted?
  • I thought he was going to apply for the next level once his kids were in school, but he still hasn’t made a move.
  • Why would anyone want to stay in that job instead of going for more money?

I cannot answer that last question for everyone, but for me, I like the combination of leading and mentoring still mixed with project work and task completion alongside regular communication and relationships with the people who benefit from our products and services.

And, I believe, there are others like me.

For those of us in the American Middle Management role who say, I like what I do.  I do not want to be constantly pursuing the next level, there is a danger of being labeled a “slacker” or an underachiever. Middle Management is often viewed as a bridge from beginning supervision to Leadership.  It is not considered a career goal; it is seen as a means to an end.  So, when I, and others like me, make no attempt to apply for the next rung on the ladder, it raises eyebrows… and suspicions.

The question Stuck in the Middle? is not self-help to move out of middle management, but rather questions if we need to see being in Middle Management as being stuck at all.

I say Nay. (Cue your own patriotic or inspirational music here).

I say it is time for Middle Managers to stand proud and be respected. Because, frankly, we are important to our organizations, and we navigate really difficult and complex situations that benefit the organizations we work for. This past week, I have mentioned this topic and the challenges I believe middle managers face to my neighbor and walking partner, my bar trivia partner, my friend who is a high school department chair, and one of my IPD instructors.  They each gave me additional challenges they thought should be addressed based on their personal experiences with managing in the middle!  It seems the complexities of middle management are a shared experience – as I suspected (based on this small anecdotal sampling).

This series, Stuck in the Middle? will focus on the specific dilemmas faced by middle management with strategies to navigate them and will wrap up with what upper management can do to support the essential work of middle managers.

When will this series wrap up?  Who knows?  It depends on how many more middle management challenges pour in.

And Kudos to all you middle managers out there.  You have my respect.

Read More

Transformation Leadership – Free Training | Past Webinar

Transformation Leadership

More and more organizations are embracing transformational efforts.  This session will discuss how to ensure successful transformation and how you can play a role in that success.

Kay Take-Aways:
  • Strategies to effectively lead transformation efforts
  • Tips to ensure that those transformations stick

AUDIENCE:

  • Business Architects
  • Transformation Professionals
  • Product Leaders
  • C-Suite
  • Organizational Change Managers
  • Project Managers

Watch Video Here:

More About the Presenter:

Mandy Spiess

Read More

Stop the World | I Want to Accomplish Something Important

Stop the World; I Want to Get Off Accomplish Something Important

Beth Schaefer IPD Director  

stop the World Blog 1

Explaining Stop the World Logic

I had a conversation with a colleague last week who was lamenting the lack of time to complete all their work.  This led me to think about time management and a phrase I often use in both my work and personal life, Stop the world; I want to catch up. I need everyone else to freeze in time so that I have a few days to keep working and get caught up.

And, as often happens, real life generates an article idea. In this case: time management. Yes, this is an old topic, but a perennial favorite because so many of us still feel the time crunch.  Add it to the list of other topics we can never seem to get consistently right: change management, process improvement, onboarding, (add your own topic here).  These are topics that we are constantly revisiting and learning more about because the gap between doing it, and doing it well, is so large.

Researching innovative time management ideas turned this one article into the Stop the World collection of articles.  Because, as research tells me, time management is about more than just catching up.

What Am I Doing All Day?

Thinking about time management reminded me of Covey’s 7 Habits for Highly Effective People. I most recently used Covey in teaching a college course on effective supervision. Covey divides your time into four quadrants based on importance and urgency.

 

  1. Necessity: Important and Urgent
  2. Effectiveness: Important and Not Urgent
  3. Distraction: Not Important and Urgent
  4. Waste: Not Important and Not Urgent
time management matrix

The Stop the World collection will focus on reducing Distraction and Waste so that you have more time for the Necessary and Effective. This may seem an obvious solution; however, the latest workplace trend is “Present-ness.”

Looking Busy

While “being present” is a good thing; present-ness is about appearing busy.  Present-ness is the response to the return-to-office movement.  Recent research has shown that people sitting at their desks in their offices are more likely to be seen as a quality worker, a dedicated worker, an engaged worker and are, therefore, more likely to receive promotions.  However, that same research reveals that the traditional thinking of “desk = productivity” is not accurate.

Sitting at a desk in the office does not mean those workers are more productive.  When it comes to perception vs. reality, perception is 9/10th of the law, so workers are willing to sacrifice productivity in favor of appearing busy.  What are those “busy” people actually doing?

  • Answering emails (average of 9 hours a week)
  • Sitting in meetings (average of 7.5 hours a week)
  • Gossiping (average of 2-12 hours a week depending on your source)
  • Texting friends and family (average of 5 hours per week)
  • Surfing the internet/social media (average of 5 hours per week)

“Busy” is, not necessarily, productive. “Busy” can happen at the office (gossiping even more so) just as easily as at home.

Accomplishing Something Important

With that new trend in mind, let’s take a look at the Effectiveness Quadrant.  The Effectiveness Quadrant (Important, Not Urgent) includes proactive activities that can be done in an office located at work or at home:

  • Setting important goals
  • Planning
  • Relationship Building
  • Learning
  • Thinking Creatively

Just thinking about doing these things at work makes me feel guilty because I am not crossing tasks off my to-do list; however, what strikes me about this list is that it correlates quite strongly to items leaders should do to promote employee engagement.  (See our Employee Engagement series.)  I firmly believe in cultivating intentional employee engagement.  Maybe that will help me make time for important, not urgent items.

I also read this list and find that these items could fuel my own work engagement. I can proactively incorporate important, not urgent items into my own schedule to keep myself invested and model the importance of that quadrant to my team.  You can too.  What parts of your job do you love but do not take time to do because it feels like a guilty pleasure?  Do them.  If you do not have anything you like about your job, consider referencing the articles on The Great Resignation to find a new job.

For me, I love writing curriculum.  It is no longer the main part of my role, but finding pockets of projects that allow me to write curriculum sparks creativity, keeps me engaged in my work, and gives me joy. For you, these activities could be taking some training, having a conversation with a mentor, or researching a topic you are passionate about.  Clearly finding joy in your work can only be a good thing for both you and your employer.

Hopefully, the Stop the World collection of articles will help you to step off the busy-ness and step into what is important.

Next article in the collection coming next month: Stop the World; I Want to Get Off Be Innovative.

Sidebar

As part of my research, I was curious about the phrase, Stop the world – I want to get off.  Turns out it is the title of a musical from the 60’s.   Set in a circus, it is the life journey of a young boy, who stops the show to have sidebar conversations with the audience every time something disastrous happens in his life.  As an intelligent reading audience, I will leave you to draw your own connections between the workplace and the circus and add your own sidebar comments.

Read More

Politics in the Office: Part 3

Top 10 List for Leaders

By Beth Schaefer
IPD Director

Despite your best efforts for a creating a respectful workplace for civil discourse (See Part 1 and Part 2 of Politics in the Office), the day after the election, there will be winners and losers.  Do not assume everyone on your team will share your own response to the election results.

And…as the first 2 parts discussed, it is not just about red and blue, but about policies that will affect people’s families, economic status, religious beliefs, and healthcare.  Regardless of who wins, the people on your team will face an unknown future.  And, the unknown can bring fear, and fear can bring stress.

Consider these 10 strategies to assist your team through the most-intense weeks before and after the election:

  1. Accept a decrease in productivity.  Just like the December holidays or a warm sunny summer afternoon in Minnesota, the pace of work will slow down.  Plan for it rather than fight it.
  2. Plan your schedule and deadlines.  If you know that your team will be especially distracted during the weeks before and after the election, avoid creating deadlines for your most critical projects or project pieces during that time.
  3. Focus on work.  While productivity may decrease, you are still in the workplace.  You can direct people to focus on work rather than half-day discussions at the water cooler.  Consider tasks that are easy to complete.  Perhaps that will be a good week to do some “housekeeping” work (updating files, cleaning emails) that improves productivity overall but is easy to do.
  4. Model respectful discourse.  If you set political discussion boundaries, remind your team that they are still in effect after the election too.  If you did not set boundaries, consider doing so.  Be ready to respectfully end political discussions that are too long or are disrespectful.
  5. Be consistent.  Treat all your team members the same even if their politics are different than yours.   Make sure the guidelines you put in place are evenly enforced.  If someone’s political discourse is disrespectful or harassing, as the leader, you need to address it.  See Part 2 for strategies.  When your team sees that you are serious about a safe space at work, it can reduce their stress.
  6. Schedule check-ins.  If you do not currently do 1:1 check-in with your team members, this may be a good time to start.  Use check-in time to see if they are feeling extra stress in general.  You can do this without asking about political preferences. If they are having trouble focusing, suggest work that needs to be completed, but is not too challenging. This is also a good time to address any political talk that is not following the guidelines.
  7. Listen with empathy and seek to understand.  Even if your politics are different, you can still listen to why people are disheartened by the results and provide empathy.  See the article Heard! for a review of empathetic listening strategies.
  8. Suggest a media break.  If the elections seem to be stressing out members of your team, suggest they step away from media and social media for a few days.  Research is clear that social media can compound stress.
  9. Be ready with resources. Have your organization’s Employee Assistance Program links at the ready.  Share them with individuals as needed or proactively share them with your team.
  10.  Care.  While this article is framed through the lens of workplace productivity, genuinely caring about your individual team members is one of the best ways to help them avoid burnout– whether it is due to the election or any other endless factors that contribute to life and work stressors.

Follow Up Note: In the Part 2 article, I failed the beginning assessment for leaders.  I am happy to report that since I wrote that article, my organization provided training to staff and leaders on what types of political activity are acceptable in our workplace.  The session was informative and clarified several guidelines for me.  Since I work in education, our workplace guidelines are probably a bit trickier than most, and that made the training all the more helpful.

Read More

Politics in the Office: Part 2

By Beth Schaefer
IPD Director

Quick Quiz

  1. Does your workplace have a policy about discussing politics in the workplace?
  2. Does your workplace have policies on political ads in your office window, on your desk, on a button for your lapel or a T-shirt you wear?
  3. Do you know what those polices allow and prohibit?
  4. Do you know how to enforce it as a leader or how to diplomatically inform a coworker?

Here are the answers that I had before I did the research for this article:

  1. Maybe
  2. Maybe
  3. No
  4. No

Yes, it’s a Problem.

In Politics in the Office: Part 1, I wrote about my personal uncomfortable experience with political discussions in the workplace; however, research shows that I am not alone.

  • 60% of American workers find political discussions in the workplace UNACCEPTABLE, yet 50% of us admit to engaging in them.
  • 42% of American workers report that “political disagreements” with coworkers affect their work production.

Yes, it’s more of a problem now than in the past.

Elections are not new, but our political discourse has evolved along with our workplace behaviors.

  • Lines between work and personal life have blurred – driven by remote workers, but also by the American workplace becoming more flexible with families (like many other countries). In the past, your coworkers’ personal lives and political views may not have been integrated into workplace discussions.
  • Political discourse has become more divisive. Many political leaders themselves model rudeness and cancel culture instead of conversation and collaboration.  Where you maybe once just disagreed with someone’s vote, now you feel pressure to be suspicious of their character for a differing political view.
  • Federal policies have a larger impact on our family lives from the taxes we pay, to the cars, appliances, and windows we purchase, to the healthcare we can receive, to our families immigrating and joining us. Almost 50% of Americans fear changes brought by political elections – regardless of which side wins. This fear makes it difficult to ignore the sidebar of the national election going on outside work.
  • In addition, the stress and fear of the election can affect workers’ mental health – which in turn affects your team.

All of these add up to politics being more intrusive to work production now than in the past.

You have options as coworkers and leaders.

Both coworkers and leaders should resist using politics as a reason to demonize people.  This affects workplace relationships and contributes to a disrespectful culture that almost all workers agree they do not want as part of their workplace.

Here are some things you can do or say over the next two months to navigate politics in the office:

As a Coworker

Be aware of others.

  • You may enjoy a good political debate, but others may find your conversations draining and time-consuming, so much so that their work performance can suffer, adding stress they do not need.
  • Look at body language and listen to coworker statements to gage who may be interested in a political discussion at the water cooler or lunch room, and those who are not.
  • Do not assume your coworkers have the same political views that you do, putting them in the uncomfortable place of debating you or dodging you (see Part 1).
  • If you are passionate about a topic, consider constructive ways to share your political views and influence policy outside your workday.

    Be aware of yourself.

    • Know your own specific triggers to help you regulate your emotions at work. For instance, if you have a family member affected by immigration policy, have a statement ready, such as, “This topic frustrates me.  While I know there are two or more sides to every issue, I have family directly impacted which makes it difficult for me to have a neutral conversation with you.”
    • If you know that you do not want to discuss politics at work, be ready to dodge engagement. Have some phrases at the ready such as:
      • “I have put myself on a newsbreak, so I would prefer we discuss something else.”
      • “I have too much work to get done right now to do justice to discussing this important topic.”

    Be aware of workplace culture.

      • Know your organization’s policy on political discussions. What does the employee handbook say? Can you wear a political T-shirt or button?  Or hang a poster in your office window?  In most states, employers are allowed to make rules about political affiliation.
      • Be aware of social capital. While you may not get fired for discussing politics in the workplace, being aggressive on your viewpoints could affect how others work with you (or not) beyond the election results.
      • If it’s your boss making political statements that are racist or sexist in nature or your boss is not taking actions to squelch inappropriate comments from others, consider submitting a confidential complaint to human resources.
      • Mind your social media. If your social media promotes racism, harassment, discrimination, or threats, employers will need to address it due to liability issues.

    Be ready if you engage.

      • If you choose to engage rather than deflect or avoid, view it as a learning opportunity not as the chance to change a vote or change a mind. A sidebar office conversation is unlikely to change anyone’s vote.
      • To open a conversation where you aim to understand another’s point of view, you can try, “I know how I feel about minimum wage law, but I am curious to hear why you feel so differently than I do about it.”
      • If confronted with political viewpoints that you do not want to agree to, have some phrases at the ready based on how much you want to engage in discussion:
        • “I have not had time to research that issue yet. It appears to be quite complex. I will need to discuss it another time.”
        • “I have a different perspective. I do not want to change your mind, but maybe we could schedule time outside of work to discuss our differing perspectives to better understand each other.”
      • Have an out. At some point, you cannot spend the whole work day in the deep conversations necessary to truly understand someone else’s viewpoint on human culture or freedoms.  Be ready to agree to disagree and return to work.  Try a phrase such as, “I appreciate this discussion, but clearly we will not reach agreement today, and I have items in my inbox to get to.”

    As a Leader

    Know the rules.

    • Know the written policies of your workplace for political discussions. Educate your team on them as needed.
    • Know the unwritten rules of your workplace when it comes to political discussions. Help your team, especially new members, navigate the culture.
    • If you are a leader with no guidance from your organization…well, it may be too late for this election cycle, but suggest they tackle this topic before the next one.

    Know your staff.

      • If political discussions are polarizing and disruptive to the team’s work, consider having 1:1 conversations to raise your concerns on unintended consequences and suggest alternative times and places for political discussions to take place.
      • Note the effect on your individual team members. Even if a team member does not speak up, if you are aware that an election outcome will drastically change their life, handle the emotional situation the same way you would handle other factors that affect mental health.

    Set the example.

    • Be ready to pivot the team conversation when it interferes with work production. “While I do not think we will agree on gun laws today, I think we can all agree that we need a new strategy to streamline the invoice process. Tell me the latest barriers you are experiencing.”
    • Be ready to squelch conversations that are against workplace policy, “The tone of this conversation is not appropriate for our workplace culture and goes against our policy on (fill in the blank). It is time to end this discussion and focus on our work.”
    • Be ready to privately follow up with individuals whose comments violate HR policy. “You can state beliefs on gender outside the workplace, but when you are at work, our organization believes (fill in the blank), and you need to follow our policy.”

        Hopefully, having some strategies and phrases at the ready will help you navigate this election and keep the workplace productive and respectful.

        Part 3 of Politics in the Office will discuss the legalities of politics in the workplace along with supporting your coworkers post-election.

        Read More